Appeal No. 95-1536
Application 07/746,176
of data in less than all cells would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, the artisan would
have been directed to simultaneous erasure of data as taught by the prior art of record, not sequential
erasure of data.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be
extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR. )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
) APPEALS AND
JERRY SMITH ) INTERFERENCES
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
SMU/dal
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007