THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KAZUE TORIMITSU, YUKO URANO and HIDEO KIKUCHI
____________
Appeal No. 95-3082
Application No. 08/117,5461
____________
HEARD: January 12, 1999
____________
Before WEIFFENBACH, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 4 through 15, which are
the only claims remaining in this application.
1Application for patent filed September 7, 1993.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/777,572, filed October 16, 1991, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007