Appeal No. 95-3606
Application 07/827,691
Conclusion
We reverse the examiner’s rejection of method Claims 41,
10, 15, 27, 6, 9, 34, and 35 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of
the combined teachings of Kremer, Innis I, and Innis II.
We reverse the examiner’s rejection of method Claim 11
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of the combined teachings of
Kremer, Innis I, Innis II, and Mullis.
We affirm the examiner’s rejection of Claims 42 and 29-33
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 in view of the combined teachings of
Kremer, Innis I, and Innis II. This rejection constitutes a
NEW GROUND OF REJECTION UNDER 37 CFR § 1.196(b).
We remand this application to the examiner for
consideration anew of the patentability of the claimed subject
matter under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, 35 U.S.C. §
112, first paragraph, and 35 U.S.C. § 103.
The examiner shall set a time for response to the NEW
GROUND OF REJECTION when he sets the time for response to
further action under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, 35
U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, and 35 U.S.C. § 103.
- 31 -
Page: Previous 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007