Ex parte PERGOLIZZI et al. - Page 25




          Appeal No. 95-3606                                                          
          Application 07/827,691                                                      
          useful for sequencing DNA having a high GC-content (Innis I,                
          col. 2, l. 51-65) and Innis I and II teach that a 3:1                       
          c dGTP:dGTP mixture is preferred for use in structure-7                                                                          
          independent DNA amplification by PCR at least when                          
          visualization of the product using known techniques is                      
          required, it would have been prima facie obvious to a person                
          having ordinary skill in the art to use either 7-deaza-dGTP or              
          3:1 c dGTP:dGTP mixtures as the 7-deaza-dGTP additive7                                                                      
          routinely used in the fragile X DNA sequencing process                      
          described by Kremer.  While Claim 42 is directed to “[a] kit                
          for determining whether an individual carries a mutation for                
          Fragile X,” it is apparent from appellants’ own specification               
          that opening the PCR reaction mixture to added GTP or dGTP                  
          precludes reliable use of the full scope of the claimed kit                 
          for the determination indicated.  Note that In re Dillon, 919               
          F.2d 688, 16 USPQ2d 1897 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (en banc), cert.                  
          denied, 500 U.S. 904 (1991), instructs at 693, 16 USPQ2d at                 
          1901:                                                                       
               Each situation must be considered on its own facts, but                
          it                                                                          
               is not necessary in order to establish a prima facie case              
               of obviousness that both [the] . . . key component[s] of               
          a                                                                           
               composition . . . be shown and that there be a suggestion              

                                         - 25 -                                       





Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007