Appeal No. 1995-4867 Application 07/993,482 Zabeau et al. (Zabeau), “Enhanced Expression Of Cro-$-Galactosidase Fusion Proteins Under The Control Of The P Promoter Of Bacteriophase 8,” The EMBO Journal, Vol. 1, R No. 10, pp. 1217-24 (1982). Gorski et al. (Gorski), “The Stability Of Bacteriophase T4 Gene 32 mRNA: A 5' Leader Sequence That Can Stabilize mRNA Transcripts,” Cell, Vol. 43, pp. 461-69 (1985). Miyake et al. (Miyake), “Secretion Of Human Interferon-" Induced By Using Secretion Vectors Containing A Promoter And Signal Sequence Of Alkaline Phosphatase Gene Of Escherichia coli,” J. Biochem., Vol.97, pp. 1329-36 (1985). Chang et al. (Chang) EPO 0 196 864 Oct. 08, 1986 Claim 31 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Crowl, Maniatis, Zabeau, Gorski, Chang and Miyake. We reverse. DISCUSSION 1. Claim interpretation “The name of the game is the claim.” In re Hiniker Co., 150 F.3d 1367, 1369, 47 USPQ2d 1523, 1529 (Fed. Cir. 1998). In deciding patentability issues under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the court observed in Panduit Corp. v. Dennison Mfg. Co., 810 F.2d 1561, 1567-68, 1 USPQ2d 1593, 1597 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1052 (1987), “Analysis begins with a key legal question--what is the invention claimed?” since “[c]laim interpretation . . . will normally control the remainder of the decisional process. Here, the language in claim 31 which needs to be interpreted is the statement that the expression cassette is “for the secretion of a disulfide bond-containing polypeptide in a biologically active, mature form from an E. coli host cell into the culture medium.” The 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007