THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ABDUL GAFFAR, JOHN J. AFFILITTO, THOMAS G. POLEFKA,
NURAN NABI and MARILOU T. JOZIAK
____________
Appeal No. 1995-4903
Application No. 07/926,0161
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Application for patent filed August 7, 1992. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/794,783 filed November 25, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,208,009 issued May
4, 1993; which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/631,232 filed
December 20, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,096,699 issued March 17, 1992; which
is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/594,598 filed October 9, 1990,
now U.S. Patent No. 5,158,763 issued October 27, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007