THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DORON FRIEDMAN, JOSEPH SCHWARTZ
and HAIM AVIV
____________
Appeal No. 95-4914
Application No. 08/036,1161
____________
HEARD: April 7, 1999
____________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH, and GARRIS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1-31 and 35. Representative claims
1, 3, 5, 6, and 35 are reproduced below:
1. A composition for topical application of pharmaceuticals
or cosmetics comprising submicron size droplets comprising
1Application for patent filed March 23, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007