THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DEEPAK MAHULIKAR, PAUL R. HOFFMAN
and JEFFREY S. BRADEN
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0060
Application No. 08/033,5961
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, LALL and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 13 and 15 through 36. In an Amendment After Final
(paper number 15), claims 1, 21, 23, 25, 28 through 30, 32, 34
and 35 were amended, and claims 20, 22, 27, 31 and 33 were
canceled.
1Application for patent filed March 19, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007