THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte LEE W. ATKINSON
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0347
Application No. 08/166,6091
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and HECKER, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 22, all of the claims pending.
The invention is directed to reducing computer system
power consumption. More particularly, the computer operating
1Application for patent filed December 13, 1993.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/809,301 filed December 17, 1991, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007