Appeal No. 1996-0347 Application No. 08/166,609 The examiner applies Intel for the teaching of a processor, a memory coupled thereto, production of a clock signal and the adjustment of a frequency. The teaching of a frequency adjustment is taken from page 14-15 of the reference, wherein it is stated, “In CMOS devices power consumption is closely related to clock speed. In a typical CMOS system fifty to seventy percent of the system power can be controlled by adjusting the clock speed.” The examiner recognizes that Intel does not teach a counter for counting a number of computer events and, so, turns to secondary references, Juzswik and Branson to supply such a teaching. With regard to the first rejection of claims 1 through 22 under 35 U.S.C. 103, the examiner relies on Intel in view of Juzswik. However, while the examiner relies on Juzswik for teaching the counting of a number of events and means coupled to the counter for reading the number of events, Juzswik clearly does not count any events indicative of computer activity. Juzswik is directed to power conservation and switches between a sleep mode and an active mode. However, the clock in Juzswik appears to count a time period, the 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007