Appeal No. 1996-0347
Application No. 08/166,609
The examiner relies on the following references:
Juzswik et al. (Juzswik) 4,698,748 Oct.
6, 1987
Branson 4,819,164 Apr. 4,
1989
Intel Corporation (Intel), “System and Power Management,”
Chapters 6 and 14, 386 SL Microprocessor Superset, Programmers
Reference Manual (1990) pp. 6-1 to 6-50, 10-4 to 10-7 and 14-1
to 14-23.
Claims 1 through 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as
unpatentable over Intel in view of Juzswik. In the principal
answer, the examiner entered three new grounds of rejection,
holding claims 1 through 6 and 13 through 18 unpatentable
under 35 U.S.C. 103 over Intel in view of Branson, holding
claims 11 and 12 unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 103 over Branson
in view of Intel, and holding claims 7 through 10 and 19
through 22 anticipated under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) over Branson.
Reference is made to the briefs and answers for the
respective positions of appellant and the examiner.
OPINION
We reverse.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007