Appeal No. 96-0609 Application No. 08/024,803 the processor shift register. Thus, Moran does not teach all the limitations as recited in Appellants' claims 20 and 21. We have not sustained the rejection of claims 1 through 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, nor have we sustained the rejection of claims 20 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102. Accordingly, the Examiner's decision is reversed. REVERSED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) STUART N. HECKER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) MRF/sld 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007