Appeal No. 96-1075 Application 08/041,737 semiconductor 124, because Aoki discloses the superconductor deposited on the semiconductor and, hence, deposited after the semiconductor; (2) depositing the superconductor 120 on top of the semiconductor 124, because Aoki discloses the superconductor deposited on the semiconductor; and then (3) interposing a barrier layer between the semiconductor 124 and the overlying superconductor layer as taught by Sunami. The Examiner's proposed combination produces vertically arranged layers of, from bottom to top, an insulating substrate, a semiconductor region, a barrier layer, and a superconductor region. This is a different arrangement from the disclosed invention where the semiconductor region and the superconductor region occupy different areas on the substrate and do not overlie each other. However, as discussed in the claim interpretation section, the independent claims are broad enough to encompass the Examiner's proposed combination. Some statements in the Response to Argument section of the Examiner's Answer suggest that the rejection would keep the same physical layout of Calviello with the superconductor and the semiconductor regions spaced apart - 13 -Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007