Appeal No. 96-1259
Application 08/201,185
a buffer having one location for each slot in each said queue
in said modules storing coherent transaction information.
The following reference is relied on by the examiner:
Sindhu et al. (Sindhu) 5,265,235 Nov. 23,
1993
Claims 1 to 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As
evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Sindhu
alone.
Rather than repeat the positions of appellants and the
examiner, reference is made to the Briefs and the Answer for
the respective details thereof.2
OPINION
At the outset, we note our agreement with appellants
(Brief, page 3) that claims 1 to 3 should stand or fall
together as a first group, and that dependent claim 4 should
also stand separately as a second group. We will take sole
2We note that the after final amendment of May 12, 1995, has been
entered as per the Advisory Action of May 31, 1995. We also note that the
power of attorney of August 7, 1995, has been entered as per the petition
decision of September 20, 1995.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007