THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte STEFAN P. SYWYK
Appeal No. 96-2091
Application No. 08/230,5441
ON BRIEF
Before KRASS, MARTIN, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 2 and 15 through 18 , all of the claims pending in2
1Application for patent filed April 20, 1994. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation of application
07/904,431 filed June 25, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. S,336,938
issued August 9, 1994.
2While the appendix to the principal brief indi cates that
claims 17 and 18 depend, respectively, from claims 4 and 5,
they actually depend, respectively, from claims 16 and 17.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007