Ex parte SYWYK - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-2091                                                          
          Application No. 08/230,544                                                  




               Claims 1, 2 and 15 through 18 stand rejected under 35                  
          U.S.C. 102(b) as anticipated by Wong.                                       


               Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the                     
          respective positions of appellant and the examiner.                         


                                       OPINION                                        


               In accordance with appellant's grouping of the claims at               
          page 3 of the principal brief, claims 1, 2 and 15 stand or                  
          fall, respectively, with claims 16, 17 and 18.  Therefore, we               
          will direct our attention to claims 1, 2 and 15.                            


               At the outset, we note that the language of claim 1                    
          appears, to us, to be a bit awkward.  Referring to Figure 4,                
          it would appear that the clear signal comes from a "first                   
          input means," that the set signal is from a "second input                   
          means" and that the circuit means for generating the status                 
          flag comprises elements 12, 13 and 14.  Thus, we understand                 
          what the claim language intends to cover. However, while the                

                                          4                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007