Appeal No. 96-2091 Application No. 08/230,544 claim is directed to apparatus for generating a status flag, the very first means provides a first signal which activates the status flag. It appears odd to recite the activation of something which has not yet been generated. Similarly, the second means recites the deactivation of the status flag, the generation of which is the recited goal of the claimed subject matter. A circuit means then generates the status flag from the time delay between the first and second signals. However, the first and second signals activate/deactivate the very flag they are employed to generate in the first place. In any event, since we understand the claimed subject matter sufficiently to apply prior art, we direct our attention to the rejection of the claims under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). With regard to claim 1, we will sustain the rejection under 35 U.S.C. 102(b). Clearly, in Figure 1 of Wong, there 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007