Ex parte SYWYK - Page 6




          Appeal No. 96-2091                                                          
          Application No. 08/230,544                                                  


          is a "first input means" for providing at least a first signal              
          (SET, on line 18) for activating a signal (CLOCK OUT); a                    
          "second input means" for providing at least a second signal                 
          (RESET on line 30) which deactivates the signal (CLOCK OUT)                 
          and a "circuit means" for generating the signal from a time                 
          delay between the first and second signals.                                 


               Appellant first argues that Wong, being directed to a                  
          clock chopper/expander, does not generate a "status flag"                   
          which is "both functionally and structurally distinguishable                
          from the clock chopper/expander" [principal brief, page 3].                 
          We are unpersuaded by this argument.  The CLOCK OUT signal of               
          Wong is a signal derived from first and second signals in the               
          manner set forth in instant claim 1 and we find no functional               
          or structural difference between this signal and the claimed                
          "status flag," any difference being simply one of the label                 
          attributed thereto.                                                         


               Appellant also argues [principal brief, page 4] that Wong              
          does not disclose an apparatus which has a circuit means for                
          generating a status flag from the time delay between the first              

                                          6                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007