Appeal No. 96-2274
Application No. 08/291,354
finding a thickness of the material using said value
related to said phase.
The Examiner does not rely on any references for the
rejection.
The specification is objected to under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
first paragraph, for failing to provide an adequate written
description of the invention. Claims 18 through 21, 25 and 27
through 30 stand rejected for the reasons set forth in the
objection to the specification. Claims 18 through 21, 25 and
27 through 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second
paragraph, for failing to particularly point out and
distinctly claim the subject matter which appellants regard as
their invention.
Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the
Examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for 2
2Appellants filed an appeal brief on November 20, 1995.
Appellants filed a reply appeal brief on March 25, 1996. The
Examiner stated in the Examiner’s letter mailed April 19, 1996
that the reply brief has been entered and considered but no
further response by the Examiner is deemed necessary.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007