Appeal No. 96-2274
Application No. 08/291,354
The Examiner argues that the specification on page 18
fails to disclose any structure to any degree of enabling
detail. Appellants argue on page 3 of the reply brief that
the Examiner has only stated a conclusion. Appellants point
out that the Examiner did not provide any support for this
conclusion.
Upon a careful review of the record, we find that the
Examiner did not have a reasonable basis for questioning the
sufficiency of the disclosure, and thereby the burden did not
shift to the Appellants to come forward with evidence to rebut
10
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007