Ex parte KRUEGER et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-2481                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 07/828763                                                   


               an allocation table and a data region divided into                     
               data areas, each allocation table having entries                       
               corresponding to region data areas, the block                          
               allocation routine for selecting a block in which to                   
               store data;                                                            
                    a data area allocation routine for selecting a                    
               data area within the data region for the selected                      
               block in which to store data, for selecting an                         
               allocation                                                             
               table entry to correspond to the selected data area,                   
               and for setting the selected allocation table entry                    
               to correspond to the selected data area and to an                      
               allocated state; and                                                   
                    a storage routine for storing data in the                         
               selected data area.                                                    
               The references relied on by the patent examiner in                     
          rejecting the claims follows:                                               
          Hoel et al.                4,942,541              Jul. 17,                  
          1990                                                                        
          (Hoel)                                                                      
          Harari                     5,268,870              Dec.  7,                  
          1993.                                              (filed Aug.              
          6, 1990)                                                                    

               Claims 1-3, 11-18, and 42-45 stand rejected under 35                   
          U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Hoel.  Claims 19-21 stand                 
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Harari.  Rather              
          than repeat the arguments of the appellants or examiner in                  
          toto, we refer the reader to the briefs and the answers for                 
          the respective details thereof.                                             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007