THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RECAI SEZI, RAINER LEUSCHNER, HORST BORNDOERFER,
MICHAEL SEBALD, SIEGFRIED BIRKLE and HELLMUT AHNE
____________
Appeal No. 96-3019
Application No. 08/386,1361
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, WARREN and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed February 9, 1995.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/121,658 filed September 15, 1993, now
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application No.
07/811,824 filed December 20, 1991, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007