Ex parte SEZI et al. - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 96-3019                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/386,136                                                                                                             





                                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                           
                          This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the examiner’s                                                                     
                 refusal to allow claims 1 through 20, which are all of the                                                                             
                 claims in the application.2                                                                                                            


                                                                THE INVENTION                                                                           
                          Appellants’ invention is directed to a radiation                                                                              
                 sensitive layer containing a polymer having carboxylic acid                                                                            
                 anhydride functionality and carboxylic acid t-butyl ester                                                                              
                 groups, a photoinitiator and a solvent.                                                                                                


                                                                   THE CLAIMS                                                                           
                          Claim 1 is illustrative of appellants’ invention and is                                                                       
                 reproduced below.                                                                                                                      

                          2A response under 37 CFR § 1.116, filed December 11,                                                                          
                 1995, contained no amendments to the claims.  A further                                                                                
                 response under 37 CFR § 1.116 was filed concurrently with the                                                                          
                 Brief, dated April 19, 1996 (Paper No. 12).  Although, no                                                                              
                 advisory action was issued, the amendment was refused entry by                                                                         
                 the examiner in the answer (pages 2-3).  Accordingly, the                                                                              
                 claims before us are as amended in the amendment of July 20,                                                                           
                 1995 (Paper No. 21).                                                                                                                   
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007