Ex parte SEZI et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-3019                                                           
          Application No. 08/386,136                                                   


          Ito(‘628).  See In re Burckel, 592 F.2d 1175, 1180, 201 USPQ                 
          67, 71 (CCPA 1979); In re Lindner, 457 F.2d 506, 508, 173 USPQ               
          356, 358 (CCPA 1972).                                                        
               Accordingly, based on our consideration of the totality                 
          of the record before us, and having evaluated the prima facie                
          case of obviousness in view of appellants’ arguments and                     
          evidence, we conclude that the preponderance of evidence                     
          weighs in favor of obviousness of the claimed subject matter                 
          within the meaning of                                                        
          § 103.  See In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1445, 24 USPQ2d                    
          1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992).                                                 


















                                          10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007