Ex parte SEZI et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 96-3019                                                           
          Application No. 08/386,136                                                   


          one of the following two options with respect to the new                     
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37                  
          CFR § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                   
                    (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                         
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                    
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                    
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                        
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                     
                    (2) Request that the application be reheard                        
               under § 1.197(b) by the Board of Patent Appeals and                     
               Interferences upon the same record. . . .                               
               Should the appellants elect to prosecute further before                 
          the Primary Examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(1), in                    
          order to preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C. §§                
          141 or 145 with respect to the affirmed rejection, the                       
          effective date of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion                
          of the prosecution before the examiner unless, as a mere                     
          incident to the limited prosecution, the affirmed rejection is               
          overcome.                                                                    
               If the appellants elect prosecution before the examiner                 
          and this does not result in allowance of the application,                    
          abandonment or a second appeal, this case should be returned                 
          to the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences for final                   


                                          12                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007