Appeal No. 96-3392 Application 08/121,512 the uncharged non-image portion of the drum. Kurokawa discloses applying the bias application voltage to the developer a predetermined time after starting rotation of the latent image carrier and starting charging of the carrier (figure 9) for the same purpose of eliminating deposition of developer on the non-image area as appellants' invention. The examiner found that the sole difference between Kurokawa and the subject matter of claim 1 is that claim 1 recites a one-component developer and Kurokawa discloses a two-component developer. The examiner concluded that "it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use a one-component developer instead of a two-component developer since the use of one-component developers is [sic, was] extremely well known in the art and the applicant has not disclosed that the use of such developers is critical to the proper functioning of the invention" (FR4). We agree. Since both one-component and two-component systems use bias application to control deposition of toner, and since both suffer from the same problem of excess toner being deposited on the non-image portion of the drum, one of ordinary skill in the image forming art would have been motivated to apply the - 7 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007