Appeal No. 96-3618
Application 08/004,598
connection with the TELCO. The rejection of claim 47 is
reversed.
20. Claims 65, 68, 70, and 75:
§ 103(a) over Gillig, Schellinger, and Emmert
Claim 65 recites a "structure" corresponding to a
cordless base station having a rechargeable battery. The
Examiner applies Emmert. Emmert teaches a rechargeable
battery in the handset 101, not in the cordless base station
as required by the claim. Nevertheless, this limitation is
not argued by Appellant.
Claim 65 further recites "a first and second transceiver"
"the arrangement being further characterized by being
functional, even if not being connected with said at least one
hardwired telephone line, to effectuate telephonic connection
between a portable cordless telephone instrument and a
cellular telephone base station." Schellinger does not
suggest putting a cellular transceiver in the cordless base
station that would communicate with a cellular telephone
system and, therefore, does not suggest a non-hardwired
connection with the TELCO. Emmert does not cure this
- 45 -
Page: Previous 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007