THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KOUICHI MISHIO, SATOSHI TAKAHASHI and SHIGERU KOMATSU
____________
Appeal No. 96-3997
Application No. 08/173,9531
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 5, 6, 8, and 9, all of the claims pending in the
present application. Claims 1-4 and 7 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed December 28, 1993.
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application No. 07/720,831, filed September 16, 1991, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007