Ex parte MISHIO et al. - Page 5

          Appeal No. 96-3997                                                          
          Application No. 08/173,953                                                  


          art the obviousness of the invention as set forth in claims 5,              
          6, 8, and 9.  Accordingly, we reverse.                                      

































                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007