THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CARMEN I. HUBER, TITO E. HUBER
and NICHOLAS CAVIRIS
__________
Appeal No. 97-0598
Application 08/322,6701
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before MARTIN, FLEMING and LALL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of all pending claims 5 through 8, 11 through 14,
1Application for patent filed October 13, 1994.
According to the appellants, the application is a division of
Application 08/059,766, filed May 11, 1993, now U.S. Patent
5,421,396, issued June 6, 1995.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007