THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SEETHARAMAIAH MANNAVA ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2075 Application No. 08/362,3621 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 5 and 9 to 20. Claims 6 to 8, the remaining claims pending in this application, have been objected to as depending from a non-allowed claim. We AFFIRM. 1Application for patent filed December 22, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007