Appeal No. 1997-2294 Page 11 Application No. 08/284,183 22-28 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e). Next and last, we address the novelty of claims 40-49. Novelty of Claims 40-49 Regarding claims 40-49, the examiner makes the following assertion: McClure shows ... at least one pair of bit lines SN- SN- of the memory; a local data write driver circuit WRSEL, 38j, 54T-57T, 59T-60T, 53, 54C-57C, and 59C- 60C coupled to the latch circuit 48, the driver circuit including a plurality of transistors coupled together; the local data write driver circuit being respectively coupled to a data write control signal 38j and WRSEL so that a power supply voltage (Vcc inside 48) may be (note that "may be" is a broad term so that the Examiner can interpret it as "may be not") selectively coupled via the local data write driver circuit to an internal node of the latch circuit 48 and thus to a corresponding bit line SN-SN-, in accordance with the data write control signal 38j and WRSEL (note that the power supply voltage VCC inside 48 may not be selectively coupled to the latch circuit because of an isolation signal ISO to pass transistors 43). (Examiner’s Answer at 5-6.) The appellant replies, “circuit 48 of McClure does not have a power supply voltage selectively coupled via a local dataPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007