THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte CHIH-SIUNG WU
__________________
Appeal No. 97-2630
Application 08/186,0501
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before SCHAFER, LEE, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 13 and 15. Claims 2-6,
9, 14, 17 and 18 have been canceled. Claims 20-34 have been
withdrawn from consideration. Claims 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 16 and
19 have not been indicated as allowable, but the rejection of
these claims also has not been maintained in the examiner’s
answer.
References relied on by the Examiner
1
Application for patent filed January 24, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007