Ex parte WU - Page 4




          Appeal No. 97-2630                                                          
          Application 08/186,050                                                      

               1.  An apparatus comprising a SCSI controller and an                   
               Ethernet controller integrated onto a single                           
               integrated circuit chip, wherein the SCSI and                          
               Ethernet controller include digital control                            
               circuitry coupled to buffers, and the Ethernet                         
               controller includes analog circuitry, wherein                          
               circuitry on the integrated circuit chip is                            
               configured to limit noise generated in the analog                      
               circuitry by signals in the digital control                            
               circuitry.                                                             
               15.  An integrated circuit comprising:                                 
                    internal circuitry;                                               
                    buffers; and                                                      
                    V  leads including a first set of V  leadsss                              ss                             
               connected to the internal circuitry and a second set                   
               of V  leads connected only to the buffers.                             
                   ss                                                                 

                                       Opinion                                        
               We sustain the rejection of claim 1.  Our affirmance of                
          the obviousness rejection is based only on the arguments                    
          presented by appellants in their brief.  Arguments not raised               
          in the brief are not before us, are not at issue, and thus are              
          considered as waived.                                                       
               The rejection of claims 13 and 15 cannot be sustained.  A              
          reversal of the rejection on appeal should not be construed as              
          an affirmative indication that the appellants’ claims are                   
          patentable over prior art.  We address only the positions and               


                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007