THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT R. ALFANO and YURY BUDANSKY
_____________
Appeal No. 97-3292
Application 08/522,8271
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge,
COHEN and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 14
and 16 through 20. These claims constitute all of the claims
remaining in the application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a method of examining a
1 Application for patent filed September 1, 1995. According to appellants, the
application is a continuation of Application 08/166,196, filed December 13, 1993, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007