Appeal No. 97-3292
Application 08/522,827
reasons set forth, supra, we conclude that the method of claim
14, considered as a whole, would not have been obvious based
upon
the applied prior art. Thus, the rejection of claims 14 and
16 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 must be reversed.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
90 degree angle relative to the longitudinal axis of an optic fiber bundle, as now
claimed.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007