THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KIYOTAKA MURAI and KENJI TAKAHASHI
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1533
Application No. 08/411,2021
____________
HEARD: October 19, 1999
____________
Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to
allow claims 1 to 3, 5 and 6, as amended subsequent to the
final rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims
pending in this application.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART and enter a new rejection pursuant to
37 CFR § 1.196(b).
1Application for patent filed March 27, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007