Ex parte PHAN et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 24              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       

                       Ex parte QUOE PHAN and MARLENE L. PAUL                         
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-0433                                  
                               Application 08/741,070                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before CALVERT, STAAB, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                 
          rejection of claims 1-20 which are all the claims pending in                
          this application.  The appellants’ invention relates to a                   

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007