Ex parte PHAN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-0433                                                        
          Application 08/741,070                                                      


          method for attaching a fixation member to an optic of an                    
          intraocular lens which includes the step of securing the lens               
          bonding region of the fixation member free of enlarged anchor               
          structures to an optic member having a recess by reducing the               
          size of the recess.  An understanding of the invention can be               
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in               
          the appendix to the appellants’ brief.                                      
                                    THE PRIOR ART                                     
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Kaplan et al. (Kaplan)        4,668,446                May  26,             
          1987                                                                        
          Doyle et al. (Doyle)          5,423,929                Jun. 13,             
          1995                                                                        
          Korgel et al (Korgel)         5,523,029                Jun.  4,             
          1996                                                                        
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1-15 and 17-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103 as being unpatentable over Korgel in view of Kaplan.                    
               Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Korgel and Kaplan as applied to claims 1-15               
          and 17-19 above and further in view of Kaplan.                              
               Claim 20 stands rejected under 35 U. S.C. § 103 as being               

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007