Appeal No. 2000-0433 Application 08/741,070 insertion and later reduce the recess size by solvent removal to better secure it into the optic as taught by Kaplan et al [examiner’s answer at page 4]. The appellants argue that neither Korgel nor Kaplan disclose securing a fixation member having a lens bonding region free of an enlarged anchor structure to an optic member as recited in all of the claims on appeal. Korgel discloses a method of attaching a haptic to an optic of an intraocular lens which includes the steps of inserting the haptic fully into the hole in the haptic, then aiming and firing a laser at the end portion of the haptic to swell and interlock the end portion within the hole. (Column 5, lines 30-37). Kaplan discloses a process for making soft contact intraocular lenses which includes the step of forming a lens, forming a peripheral bore in the lens, swelling the lens with an organic fluid and inserting an end of a haptic into the peripheral bore of the swollen lens. Kaplan discloses that the end of the haptic has an enlarged transverse cross- sectional portion. (Column 2, lines 38-47). 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007