The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GUY BLALOCK and PHILLIP G. WALD ____________ Appeal No. 2000-0721 Reissue Application No. 08/628,287 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 1-83. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to stacked capacitor cells. As dynamic random access memories increase in memory cell density, maintaining sufficient storage capacitance while decreasing cell area is a challenge. APage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007