Ex parte BLALOCK et al. - Page 4




         Appeal No. 2000-0721                                      Page 4          
         Reissue Application No. 08/628,287                                        


                   dielectric layer, the surface of the                            
                   electrically conductive layer including partial                 
                   striations.                                                     


              Claims 5-83 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 1, as            
         lacking a written description.  Claims 1-83 stand rejected                
         under 35 U.S.C. § 251 as lacking an error correctable by                  
         reissue of the original patent.  Claims 5-83 stand rejected               
         under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2, as indefinite.  Rather than repeat            
         the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer             
         the reader to the briefs and answer for the respective details            
         thereof.                                                                  


                                     OPINION                                       
              In deciding this appeal, we considered the subject matter            
         on appeal and the rejection advanced by the examiner.                     
         Furthermore, we duly considered the arguments and evidence of             
         the appellants and examiner.  After considering the totality              
         of the record, we are persuaded that the examiner erred in                
         rejecting claims 1-83.  Accordingly, we reverse.  Our opinion             
         addresses the following issues:                                           
              •    written description of claims 5-83                              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007