Ex parte NOHREN et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 22              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
          Ex parte JOHN E. NOHREN, JR., HENRY C. REID, JOSEPH H. NOHREN,              
                      JOHN T. SMITH and DONALD G. HUGGINS, JR.                        
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2000-0895                                  
                             Application No. 08/754,797                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before COHEN, ABRAMS and GONZALES, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges                                                                      
          GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final              
          rejection of claims 22 through 32 and 34 through 42, which are              
          all of the claims in the application.                                       
               We REVERSE.                                                            


                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007