Appeal No. 2000-0895
Application No. 08/754,797
through 27, 29 through 32 and 34 through 41.
Since we have determined that the prior art relied on by
the examiner does not establish a prima facie case of
obviousness, it is unnecessary for this panel to consider
appellants' arguments (main brief, pages 4-9) regarding the
objective evidence of nonobviousness.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the rejection of claims 22 through 32 and
34 through 42 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007