Ex parte NOHREN et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-0895                                                        
          Application No. 08/754,797                                                  




               The subject matter on appeal is directed to a filter                   
          assembly mounted in a bottle (claims 22 through 27, 38, 40 and              
          42) and to a filter assembly per se (claims 28 through 32 and               
          34 through 37, 39 and 41).  Claims 22, 28 and 42, the only                  
          independent claims, are illustrative of the subject matter on               
          appeal and are reproduced in the “Appendix” attached to the                 
          main brief.                                                                 
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Parker         647,580                                 Apr. 17,             
          1900                                                                        
          Knight                   3,335,917                     Aug. 15,             
          1967                                                                        
          VanderBilt et al.        4,753,728                     Jun. 28,             
          1988                                                                        
          (VanderBilt)                                                                
          Magnusson et al.       5,273,649                       Dec. 28,             
          1993                                                                        
          (Magnusson)                                                                 
                   Claims 22 through 32 and 34 through 42 stand                      
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                
          Magnusson in view of either Parker or Knight and further in                 
          view of VanderBilt.                                                         
               The full text of the examiner's rejection and the                      

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007