THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 48
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSHIO KURIHARA, TOSHIYUKI NISHIO, HISAO YAMAMOTO,
MINORU KAMIMURA, SHINICHI TESHIMA,
TSUNEO HANYU and SHIGENORI EMI
____________
Appeal No. 1996-1960
Application No. 07/975,167
____________
HEARD: March 21, 2000
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, ELLIS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
13 through 20, which are all of the claims pending in this application. A copy of claims 13-20 is
attached to this decision.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007