Ex parte NICHOLSON - Page 1



                                                       Paper No. 17                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              Ex parte DONALD W. NICHOLSON                            
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 1996-2229                               
                              Application 08/196,748                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                    _______________                                   
          Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and LORIN, Administrative Patent           
          Judges.                                                                     
          WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                                                                     
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision rejecting           
          claims 1 through 4, which are all of the claims in the                      
          application.                                                                
               Claim 1, which is illustrative of the subject matter on                
          appeal, reads as follows:                                                   
               1.  LTC  synthase, in substantially free form, having a                
                      4                                                               
          molecular weight of 18 kDa as determined on silver stained                  
          SDS-polyacrylamide denaturing gel.                                          
                                            1                                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007