The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 33 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SVEN NORDIN ____________ Appeal No. 1996-3960 Application No. 08/380,444 ____________ HEARD: June 7, 2000 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 4 and 7 through 11. Claims 5, 6, 12 and 13 were canceled. The invention relates to a single antenna for transmitting two RF frequencies. On page 5 of the specification, Appellant identifies that the antenna is sized to be either 5/8 or 3/4 ofPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007