Ex parte NORDIN - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 33           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                                Ex parte SVEN NORDIN                                  
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1996-3960                                  
                             Application No. 08/380,444                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                 HEARD: June 7, 2000                                  
                                    ____________                                      

          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and LEVY, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1 through 4 and 7 through 11.  Claims 5, 6, 12 and 13                
          were canceled.                                                              
               The invention relates to a single antenna for                          
          transmitting two RF frequencies.  On page 5 of the                          
          specification, Appellant identifies that the antenna is sized               
          to be either 5/8 or 3/4 of                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007