Appeal No. 1997-0569 Application No. 08/150,559 examiner, it may have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to size the natural colored rock roofing granules of Wright to be in the apparently standard size range claimed by appellants, we see nothing in Wright or Lewis which teaches or suggests appellants’ particular method as set forth in claim 1 on appeal for making colored roofing granules. Wright discloses or suggests using properly graded natural colored rock granules or such granules that are further coated with a protective layer of tinted varnish as roofing granules. Lewis discloses producing iron oxide pigments by roasting relatively pure iron ores to drive off volatile matter, thus converting the natural ore to a natural iron oxide pigment. As is urged by appellants, the collective teachings of the applied references may have provided motivation or suggestion for one of ordinary skill in the art to use a pigment as produced in Lewis (col. 1) as the coloring agent for the varnish used in Wright, but in no way teach or suggest appellants’ claimed method of making colored roofing granules. As for the process that is the subject of the Lewis patent, that process for preparing an iron oxide pigment is 11Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007