Appeal No. 1997-1197
Application 08/130,255
Appellants argue that "Fujisawa et al. does not suggest
. . . providing a non-rotated image to one display, and a
rotated image to a second display" (Br19).
The Examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to
use the common display controller of figure 3 of Kajihara to
display rotated image data on different types of displays as
taught by Fujisawa so that an image can be observed at
different angles and perspective (EA5).
We find no motivation in Kajihara or Fujisawa to display
different images on two displays. Further, we do not see how
the Examiner intends to combine the references to meet the
express limitations of claim 22, in particular, the data
conversion means which receives the first scanned image data,
converts it into second image data and stores it back in
memory, creating first and second images in memory.
Accordingly, we conclude that the Examiner has failed to
establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to
claim 22. The rejection of claims 22-24 is reversed.
Claims 25 and 26
- 21 -
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007